Company Benefits Solutions Testimonials +60 3-2274 6518 Contact Us
Client satisfaction

Client Experiences

What Our Clients Say

Clients return to Clermont Law and refer others when they need reliable legal counsel. Here are some of their experiences.

Back to Home
400+
Clients advised
15+
Years combined practice
3
Focused practice areas
4.8
Average client rating

Client Reviews

Selected feedback from clients across our three practice areas.

AH
Ahmad Hafiz
Kuala Lumpur — Criminal Defence

"When I received the charge sheet, I had no idea where to begin. Razlan walked me through everything step by step. He was honest about the challenges and didn't offer empty reassurance. By the time we went to trial, I understood exactly what to expect."

March 2026

SZ
Siti Zubaidah
Shah Alam — Syariah Advisory

"Nabilah handled my fasakh application with real understanding — not just the legal procedures but the emotional difficulty of the situation. She kept me informed throughout and was patient when I had many questions about the custody process."

February 2026

LK
Lee Kai Yang
Petaling Jaya — Conveyancing

"This was my first property purchase and I was anxious about getting it right. Thivya explained each document clearly, flagged a potential issue with the title early on, and handled everything with the land office directly. The whole process was well managed."

March 2026

RM
Rajesh Menon
Kuala Lumpur — Conveyancing

"I was selling a property with an existing loan and wasn't sure about the discharge process. Clermont Law managed both the discharge and the transfer smoothly and kept the buyer's solicitors updated throughout. No issues at all on completion day."

January 2026

NF
Nurul Farahain
Ampang — Syariah Advisory

"Nabilah helped me understand the difference between what the Syariah court could and couldn't deal with regarding our matrimonial property. Her advice saved us a lot of time that would have been spent in the wrong forum. She was very thorough."

February 2026

VT
Vijay Thangaraj
Subang Jaya — Criminal Defence

"The bail application was handled quickly and professionally. Razlan was direct about what was realistic and didn't make promises he couldn't keep. That kind of honesty is actually reassuring — you know where you stand. I would recommend Clermont Law."

March 2026

Case Summaries

A brief overview of three matters we have assisted with — names and identifying details changed to preserve confidentiality.

Criminal Defence

Situation

A client was charged under the Penal Code following an altercation. The prosecution's case relied primarily on witness testimony. The client had limited understanding of the process and was concerned about the bail position.

Approach

A bail application was filed promptly. Representations were made on the client's background and ties to the jurisdiction. The charge sheet and witness statements were reviewed carefully, and gaps in the prosecution's account were identified early.

Outcome

Bail was granted. Following cross-examination of prosecution witnesses at trial, the charge was not established to the required standard. The matter concluded in the client's favour at the Sessions Court level within eight months of the initial charge.

Syariah Advisory

Situation

A client sought to dissolve her marriage and establish custody arrangements for two young children. There was also a jointly-owned property and maintenance dispute to address. She was uncertain which proceedings to begin first and which courts were involved.

Approach

We advised on jurisdiction and sequencing — explaining which matters were within Syariah court authority and which required civil proceedings. The fasakh application was filed in the Wilayah Persekutuan Syariah Court alongside a hadhanah application.

Outcome

The dissolution was granted. Interim custody was secured at an early stage, with a final custody order following three months later. The harta sepencarian claim was settled by agreement before a contested hearing, avoiding further prolonged proceedings.

Conveyancing

Situation

A client purchased a leasehold apartment in KL. The title search revealed an outstanding private caveat lodged by a third party, and the remaining lease period raised a question about the bank's willingness to extend full financing.

Approach

We identified the caveat issue early and advised the client before the SPA was signed. Representations were made to the vendor's solicitors and the caveat was removed as a pre-condition of the transaction proceeding. Discussions with the financier addressed the leasehold term.

Outcome

The caveat was withdrawn within three weeks. Financing was confirmed on terms acceptable to the client. The transfer was completed at the land office on schedule, approximately five months after SPA execution, with no further title complications.

Reach Us Directly

Telephone
+60 3-2274 6518
Address
51 Jalan Sultan Hishamuddin
50000 Kuala Lumpur
Office Hours
Mon–Fri 9am–6pm
Sat 9am–1pm

Would you like to discuss your matter?

An initial consultation gives you a clearer picture of your legal position and what options may be available. We welcome enquiries by telephone or through our contact form.

Contact Clermont Law